GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.61
Power efficiencyno data2.71
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2GF110
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 May 2020 (4 years ago)29 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512448
Core clock speed300 MHz732 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate33.6040.99
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1280 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared950 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data152.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.97N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 29 November 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 210 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 49 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.