Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking608not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.96no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)no data
GPU code nameIce Lake G7 Gen. 11no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6438
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt53 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4LPDDR5-6400
Shared memory+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2019 17 January 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 53 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 341.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 237 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 198 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.