Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data53.47
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 May 2020 (4 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed300 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60129.6
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 30 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.