GeForce RTX 4050 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) with GeForce RTX 4050, including specs and performance data.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2019
12 Watt
4.06

RTX 4050 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by a whopping 821% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking691124
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Power efficiency11.3226.08
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake G4 Gen. 11AD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482560
Core clock speed300 MHz2505 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2640 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data211.2
Floating-point processing powerno data13.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data216.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−775%
140−150
+775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−809%
100−105
+809%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9
−789%
80−85
+789%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%
Hitman 3 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%
Metro Exodus 19
−795%
170−180
+795%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
−800%
90−95
+800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−714%
350−400
+714%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%
Hitman 3 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%
Metro Exodus 14
−757%
120−130
+757%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−714%
350−400
+714%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−817%
220−230
+817%
Hitman 3 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−757%
60−65
+757%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−714%
350−400
+714%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Hitman 3 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−820%
230−240
+820%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) and RTX 4050 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 is 775% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.06 37.40
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 100 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) has 733.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 821.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1960 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.