A100 PCIe 80 GB vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.07no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data28 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126912
Core clock speed400 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate32.00609.1
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs32432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared80 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1593 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe 80 GB, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 950 and A100 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a desktop card while A100 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
A100 PCIe 80 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 71 vote

Rate A100 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.