RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking665not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.32no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed300 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40360.0
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 121 vote

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.