P106M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking661not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.46no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eGP106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 October 2019 (5 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841152
Core clock speed300 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate50.4092.95
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs632
TMUs4872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.13 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 23 January 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has an age advantage of 8 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and P106M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a desktop card while P106M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVIDIA P106M
P106M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 116 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate P106M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.