Arc 130T Mobile vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking714not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.69no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eArrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate52.80123.2
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs628
TMUs4856
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Arc 130T Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 312 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.