HD Graphics 4600 vs Iris Graphics 550

Place in the ranking	711	917
Place by popularity	not in top-100	64
Power efficiency	16.96	6.31
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code name	Skylake GT3e	Haswell GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	27 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	160
Core clock speed	300 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	48.00	22.00
Floating-point processing power	0.768 TFLOPS	0.352 TFLOPS
ROPs	6	2
TMUs	48	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Graphics 550 3.71
+102%

HD Graphics 4600 1.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Graphics 550 1428
+101%

HD Graphics 4600 710

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Graphics 550 2534
+178%

HD Graphics 4600 911

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Graphics 550 9761
+87.6%

HD Graphics 4600 5203

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Graphics 550 1648
+159%

HD Graphics 4600 636

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Graphics 550 12986
+131%

HD Graphics 4600 5613

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Graphics 550 144742
+243%

HD Graphics 4600 42243

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	27−30 +92.9%	14 −92.9%
Full HD	18 +80%	10 −80%
1440p	28 +133%	12−14 −133%
4K	50 +108%	24−27 −108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
+50%

4−5

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Hitman 3	7 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +47.1%	16−18 −47.1%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +50%	6 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +17.1%	35−40 −17.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Hitman 3	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +47.1%	16−18 −47.1%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +46.2%	13 −46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +17.1%	35−40 −17.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Hitman 3	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +47.1%	16−18 −47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +17.1%	35−40 −17.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+125%

4−5

−125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+40%

5−6

−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

This is how Iris Graphics 550 and HD Graphics 4600 compete in popular games:

Iris Graphics 550 is 93% faster in 900p
Iris Graphics 550 is 80% faster in 1080p
Iris Graphics 550 is 133% faster in 1440p
Iris Graphics 550 is 108% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Graphics 550 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Iris Graphics 550 is ahead in 51 test (96%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.71	1.84
Recency	1 September 2015	27 May 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt

Iris Graphics 550 has a 101.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Iris Graphics 550 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4600 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.