Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs Iris Graphics 540

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking738not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.57no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843840
Core clock speed300 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1967 MHz
Number of transistors189 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00472.1
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs696
TMUs48240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusApple MPX
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGPQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 3 August 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 400 Watt

Iris Graphics 540 has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X Duo, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 540 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Graphics 540
Iris Graphics 540
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 92 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 39 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.