RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ION 2

Place in the ranking	1302	109
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.15	23.95
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GT218	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	3072
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	260 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	4.000	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.03424 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	16000 MHz
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	1.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ION 2 0.33

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.47
+11861%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ION 2 724

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844
+5127%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−11400%

230−240
+11400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −11567%	350−400 +11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −11775%	950−1000 +11775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11686%	3300−3350 +11686%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −11567%	350−400 +11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −11775%	950−1000 +11775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −11567%	1050−1100 +11567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11686%	3300−3350 +11686%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −11567%	350−400 +11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −11775%	950−1000 +11775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −11150%	450−500 +11150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −11567%	1050−1100 +11567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11686%	3300−3350 +11686%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −11567%	700−750 +11567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −11400%	230−240 +11400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−11400%

230−240
+11400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −10900%	110−120 +10900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−11400%

230−240
+11400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	39.47
Recency	3 June 2008	21 March 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	115 Watt

ION 2 has 475% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11860.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that ION 2 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.