Radeon RX 7600M XT vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and Radeon RX 7600M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
2011
0.34

RX 7600M XT outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 9962% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1294151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.88
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores62048
Core clock speed350 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data316.0
Floating-point processing powerno data20.23 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 0.34
RX 7600M XT 34.21
+9962%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 976
RX 7600M XT 94691
+9602%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 1405
RX 7600M XT 152903
+10787%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−1614%
120
+1614%
1440p0−159
4K-0−135

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4267%
131
+4267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1575%
130−140
+1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2525%
100−110
+2525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−7800%
237
+7800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1575%
130−140
+1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5100%
208
+5100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−611%
60−65
+611%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2733%
85
+2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1650%
140
+1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4400%
180
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1011%
100
+1011%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−114%
60
+114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Hitman 3 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−5200%
106
+5200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 30

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139
+0%
139
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
+0%
114
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 142
+0%
142
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+0%
62
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+0%
67
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+0%
120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+0%
22
+0%

This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 1614% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 7800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 34.21
Recency 1 May 2011 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm

RX 7600M XT has a 9961.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 84 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.