ATI Rage Mobility-M3 vs HD Graphics P630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.45no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2M3
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed350 MHz105 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.400.21
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1AGP 2x
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4SDR
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB8 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared105 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data840.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 August 2016 1 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 8 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

HD Graphics P630 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 21650% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P630 and Rage Mobility-M3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Rage Mobility-M3 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
ATI Rage Mobility-M3
Rage Mobility-M3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-M3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.