T400 4 GB vs HD Graphics (Braswell)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Braswell) with T400 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Braswell)
2015
0.62

T400 4 GB outperforms HD Graphics (Braswell) by a whopping 1473% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1190453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.51
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBraswellTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384
Core clock speed320 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−1400%
450−500
+1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−1400%
450−500
+1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−1400%
450−500
+1400%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 9.75
Recency 1 April 2015 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

T400 4 GB has a 1472.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The T400 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Braswell) is a notebook card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 17 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.