Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs HD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 630 with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 630
2017
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
3.11

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking763691
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.2719.00
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (8 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors189 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0038.40
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs36
TMUs2448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 630 3.11
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.14
+33.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 630 1197
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1592
+33%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
1440p64
−32.8%
85−90
+32.8%
4K13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Elden Ring 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 5
−20%
6−7
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Dota 2 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Elden Ring 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Fortnite 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
−25%
5−6
+25%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28
−25%
35−40
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−25%
5−6
+25%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
World of Tanks 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Dota 2 22
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Far Cry 5 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Elden Ring 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
World of Tanks 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Valorant 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Far Cry 5 3
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 630 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is 23% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.11 4.14
Recency 1 January 2017 5 September 2014

HD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 2 years.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has a 33.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a notebook card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1259 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.