GeForce2 MX 400 vs HD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking753not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.91no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)3 March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed350 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.400.8
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4SDR
Maximum RAM amount64 GB32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2017 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 630 and GeForce2 MX 400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 MX 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1215 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 109 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.