Quadro FX 4400 vs HD Graphics 620

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking834not rated
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Power efficiency11.20no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2NV45
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)28 July 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz375 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt83 Watt
Texture fill rate24.004.500
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs312
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared525 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data33.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 28 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 83 Watt

HD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 453.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 620 and Quadro FX 4400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 4400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400
Quadro FX 4400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2622 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.