Arc A530M vs HD Graphics 620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 620 and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 620
2016
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
2.43

Arc A530M outperforms HD Graphics 620 by a whopping 630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking841308
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1118.71
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921536
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00124.8
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs348
TMUs2496
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 620 2.43
Arc A530M 17.74
+630%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 620 935
Arc A530M 6836
+631%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−592%
90−95
+592%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 6
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−620%
180−190
+620%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD Graphics 620 and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is 592% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 620 is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD Graphics 620 surpassed Arc A530M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 17.74
Recency 30 August 2016 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

HD Graphics 620 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 630% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2683 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 195 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.