TITAN RTX vs HD Graphics 615

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 615 with TITAN RTX, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 615
2016
16 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3, 5 Watt
1.87

TITAN RTX outperforms HD Graphics 615 by a whopping 2518% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.11
Power efficiency25.6311.98
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2TU102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924608
Core clock speed300 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate20.40509.8
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs24288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 615 1.87
TITAN RTX 48.95
+2518%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 615 721
TITAN RTX 18858
+2516%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 615 1243
TITAN RTX 49602
+3892%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 615 4102
TITAN RTX 99561
+2327%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 615 853
TITAN RTX 35884
+4107%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 615 6387
TITAN RTX 177234
+2675%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 615 70743
TITAN RTX 537413
+660%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−1050%
161
+1050%
1440p34
−197%
101
+197%
4K2−3
−3500%
72
+3500%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.52
1440pno data24.74
4Kno data34.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1386%
104
+1386%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−20800%
209
+20800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2760%
143
+2760%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4133%
127
+4133%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−3920%
201
+3920%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3914%
281
+3914%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1850%
117
+1850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 25
−1292%
348
+1292%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3075%
127
+3075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2189%
206
+2189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−514%
215
+514%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2557%
186
+2557%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−20200%
203
+20200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2520%
131
+2520%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3267%
101
+3267%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2980%
154
+2980%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3529%
254
+3529%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1876%
336
+1876%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2650%
110
+2650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−3078%
286
+3078%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−483%
204
+483%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1029%
79
+1029%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1940%
102
+1940%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2533%
79
+2533%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2400%
175
+2400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1750%
111
+1750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1182%
218
+1182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−1917%
242
+1917%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1058%
139
+1058%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−146%
86
+146%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2975%
123
+2975%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−3167%
95−100
+3167%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6500%
66
+6500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1329%
100
+1329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−2700%
168
+2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7600%
75−80
+7600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−1950%
205
+1950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2280%
119
+2280%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4800%
49
+4800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 43

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2367%
74
+2367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+0%
80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
+0%
183
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Hitman 3 48
+0%
48
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 121
+0%
121
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 109
+0%
109
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 615 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 1050% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 197% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 3500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the TITAN RTX is 20800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 48.95
Recency 30 August 2016 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 280 Watt

HD Graphics 615 has 5500% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 2517.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 615 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 615 is a notebook card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 615
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 82 votes

Rate HD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 813 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.