RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs HD Graphics 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking979not rated
Place by popularity71not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2AD104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores247424
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed950 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate22.80386.3
Floating-point performance0.3648 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2015 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

HD Graphics 5500 has 633.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 5500 and RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 5500
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1499 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.