RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs HD Graphics 530

Place in the ranking	822	8
Place by popularity	94	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.93	21.61
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Skylake GT2	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	12800
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1155 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	22.80	1,020
Floating-point processing power	0.3648 TFLOPS	65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	176
TMUs	24	400
Tensor Cores	no data	400
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 530 2.60

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 78.49
+2919%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 530 1001

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 30174
+2914%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 −2592%	350−400 +2592%
4K	7 −2900%	210−220 +2900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Elden Ring	5−6 −2900%	150−160 +2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −2592%	350−400 +2592%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Dota 2	8 −2900%	240−250 +2900%
Elden Ring	5−6 −2900%	150−160 +2900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%
Fortnite	14−16 −2757%	400−450 +2757%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −2592%	350−400 +2592%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	26 −2785%	750−800 +2785%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
World of Tanks	45−50 −2817%	1400−1450 +2817%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Dota 2	20 −2900%	600−650 +2900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −2592%	350−400 +2592%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −2817%	700−750 +2817%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −2678%	500−550 +2678%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
World of Tanks	16−18 −2841%	500−550 +2841%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −2900%	270−280 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2900%	90−95 +2900%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Valorant	9−10 −2900%	270−280 +2900%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −2713%	450−500 +2713%
Elden Ring	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Dota 2	7 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Fortnite	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Valorant	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%

This is how HD Graphics 530 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 2592% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 2900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.60	78.49
Recency	1 September 2015	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt

HD Graphics 530 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 2918.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 530 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a notebook card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.