Quadro RTX 8200 vs HD Graphics 530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking813not rated
Place by popularity97not in top-100
Power efficiency11.96no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1927552
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed950 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors189 million40,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate22.80708.0
Floating-point processing power0.3648 TFLOPS22.66 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs24472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 GB48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 260 Watt

HD Graphics 530 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 8200, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 530 and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 8200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1447 votes

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.