RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs HD Graphics 520

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking857not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Power efficiency9.97no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2AD106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924608
Core clock speed300 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors189 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60244.1
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs348
TMUs24144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 115 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2965 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.