Tesla T4 vs HD Graphics 505

Place in the ranking	1132	208
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.77	27.53
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Apollo Lake GT1.5	TU104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 September 2016 (8 years ago)	13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	144	2560
Core clock speed	200 MHz	585 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.70	254.4
Floating-point processing power	0.1872 TFLOPS	8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	64
TMUs	18	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	320.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 505 0.90

Tesla T4 26.85
+2883%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 505 361

Tesla T4 10750
+2878%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−2789%

260−270
+2789%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −2800%	290−300 +2800%
Fortnite	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8 −2775%	230−240 +2775%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%
World of Tanks	21−24 −2855%	650−700 +2855%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −2800%	290−300 +2800%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −2627%	300−310 +2627%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
World of Tanks	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%
Valorant	6−7 −2733%	170−180 +2733%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −2713%	450−500 +2713%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −2567%	400−450 +2567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −2567%	400−450 +2567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Dota 2	16−18 −2713%	450−500 +2713%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%

This is how HD Graphics 505 and Tesla T4 compete in popular games:

Tesla T4 is 2789% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.90	26.85
Recency	1 September 2016	13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	70 Watt

HD Graphics 505 has 600% lower power consumption.

Tesla T4, on the other hand, has a 2883.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla T4 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 505 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 505 is a notebook card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

HD Graphics 505

Tesla T4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVIDIA GTX 650 Ti OEM

AMD HD 7950 Mac Edition

Graphics (Broadwell)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 263 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.1 230 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or Tesla T4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.