RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs HD Graphics 5000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5000 with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 5000
2013
30 Watt
1.52

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms HD Graphics 5000 by a whopping 4778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.01
Power efficiency3.5317.24
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32018176
Core clock speed200 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate40.001,423
Floating-point processing power0.64 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs40568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data960.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 5000 1.52
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.15
+4778%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5000 586
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28606
+4782%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 5000 1034
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+6755%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 5000 4277
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+2857%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 5000 716
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+5026%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−1760%
186
+1760%
1440p3−4
−5267%
161
+5267%
4K2−3
−5750%
117
+5750%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data36.55
1440pno data42.23
4Kno data58.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5750%
110−120
+5750%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7967%
240−250
+7967%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1660%
260−270
+1660%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3800%
300−350
+3800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−364%
150−160
+364%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5750%
110−120
+5750%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7967%
240−250
+7967%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1660%
260−270
+1660%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3800%
300−350
+3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1345%
150−160
+1345%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−364%
150−160
+364%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5750%
110−120
+5750%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7967%
240−250
+7967%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1660%
260−270
+1660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3800%
300−350
+3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2264%
260
+2264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−364%
150−160
+364%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−16500%
160−170
+16500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−5500%
110−120
+5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8600%
85−90
+8600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1429%
100−110
+1429%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−3680%
180−190
+3680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−21800%
219
+21800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−3329%
240−250
+3329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2850%
110−120
+2850%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6800%
65−70
+6800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−5800%
55−60
+5800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50−55
Far Cry 5 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 5000 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1760% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 5267% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 5750% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 21800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 44 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 74.15
Recency 27 May 2013 3 December 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

HD Graphics 5000 has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 4778.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5000 is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5000
HD Graphics 5000
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 182 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 83 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.