GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs HD Graphics 5000

Place in the ranking	970	1092
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.53	2.27
Architecture	Generation 7.5 (2013)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Haswell GT3	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2013 (11 years ago)	3 February 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	384
Core clock speed	200 MHz	745 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,300 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	32 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	23.84
Floating-point processing power	0.64 TFLOPS	0.5722 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	40	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	512 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	40 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

10
+66.7%

6−7

−66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
+100%

1−2

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how HD Graphics 5000 and GT 640M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 5000 is 67% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.52	1.04
Recency	27 May 2013	3 February 2013
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	32 Watt

HD Graphics 5000 has a 46.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.