Radeon HD 7410M vs HD Graphics 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1156not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameApollo LakeSeymour
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12160
Core clock speed300 MHz480 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.0003.840
Floating-point processing power0.144 gflops0.1536 gflops
ROPs24
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.97N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2016 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm

HD Graphics 500 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 500 and Radeon HD 7410M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 500 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 7410M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500
AMD Radeon HD 7410M
Radeon HD 7410M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 663 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.