GeForce3 Ti200 vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking918not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2NV20 A5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 October 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20no data
Core clock speed200 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million57 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate27.001.400
Floating-point performance0.432 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data183 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.31.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 1 October 2001
Chip lithography 22 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics 4600 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 581.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4600 and GeForce3 Ti200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook card while GeForce3 Ti200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200
GeForce3 Ti200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2272 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate GeForce3 Ti200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.