RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs HD Graphics 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4200 with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4200
2013
4 Watt
0.97

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms HD Graphics 4200 by a whopping 5473% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking112147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 September 2013 (11 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1606144
Core clock speed200 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors392 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate17.00299.5
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs20192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data280.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−5456%
500−550
+5456%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−5285%
700−750
+5285%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−5384%
1700−1750
+5384%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−5285%
700−750
+5285%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−5384%
1700−1750
+5384%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−5285%
700−750
+5285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−5384%
1700−1750
+5384%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−5400%
220−230
+5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−5400%
220−230
+5400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

This is how HD Graphics 4200 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 5456% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 54.06
Recency 2 September 2013 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 70 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has 1650% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 5473.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4200 is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 39 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 48 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.