GMA 3150 vs HD Graphics 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11181541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.05no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 September 2013 (11 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16016
Core clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate17.000.8
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs21
TMUs202

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.32.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
World of Tanks 13 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data
World of Tanks 5−6 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 6−7 no data

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Valorant 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2013 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 13 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4200 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 41 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 142 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4200 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.