FirePro S7150 vs HD Graphics 4200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4200 with FirePro S7150, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4200
2013
4 Watt
0.99

S7150 outperforms HD Graphics 4200 by a whopping 739% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1102500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.40
Power efficiency17.143.84
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Tonga
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1602048
Core clock speed200 MHz920 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate17.00117.8
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPS3.768 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs20128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−713%
65−70
+713%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data36.91

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Hitman 3 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−739%
260−270
+739%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Hitman 3 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−739%
260−270
+739%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−739%
260−270
+739%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Hitman 3 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

This is how HD Graphics 4200 and FirePro S7150 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro S7150 is 713% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 8.31
Recency 2 September 2013 1 February 2016
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 150 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 3650% lower power consumption.

FirePro S7150, on the other hand, has a 739.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The FirePro S7150 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4200 is a desktop card while FirePro S7150 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 41 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.