Quadro RTX 8000 vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 405 with Quadro RTX 8000, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 405
2015
6 Watt
0.73

RTX 8000 outperforms HD Graphics 405 by a whopping 6753% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking116561
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.90
Power efficiency8.3413.19
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284608
Core clock speed200 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate9.600509.8
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs16288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−6567%
1000−1050
+6567%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−6718%
750−800
+6718%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6674%
2100−2150
+6674%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−6718%
750−800
+6718%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−6400%
650−700
+6400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6674%
2100−2150
+6674%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−6718%
750−800
+6718%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−6400%
650−700
+6400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6674%
2100−2150
+6674%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

This is how HD Graphics 405 and RTX 8000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 6567% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 50.03
Recency 1 April 2015 13 August 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 260 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has 4233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 6753.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 405 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 201 vote

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 465 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.