GeForce G102M vs HD Graphics 405

Place in the ranking	1165	1250
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.49	2.11
Architecture	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Braswell GT1	C79
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)	8 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	16
Core clock speed	200 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	14 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.600	3.600
Floating-point processing power	0.1536 TFLOPS	0.0352 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	48
ROPs	2	4
TMUs	16	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI-E 1.0
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	Up to 512 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

no data

8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.3	2.1
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

15
+87.5%

8−9

−87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Fortnite	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
World of Tanks	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
World of Tanks	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Valorant	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Valorant	1−2	0−1

This is how HD Graphics 405 and GeForce G102M compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 405 is 88% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.74	0.43
Recency	1 April 2015	8 January 2009
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	14 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has a 72.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 405 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.