GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs HD Graphics 400
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 400 and GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 1071% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1070 | 381 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 13.59 | 12.73 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Braswell GT1 | GP107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) | 21 May 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 320 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 640 MHz | 1518 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 7.680 | 72.86 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1229 TFLOPS | 2.332 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 24 |
| TMUs | 12 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1752 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 84.1 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.13 | 13.23 |
| Recency | 1 April 2015 | 21 May 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 75 Watt |
HD Graphics 400 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1150% lower power consumption.
GTX 1050 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 1070.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.
The GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
