GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1080not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1G92B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96112
Core clock speed320 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate7.68037.80
Floating-point performance0.1229 gflops0.3629 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data70.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.80N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 July 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and GeForce GTS 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
GeForce GTS 240 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 389 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.