Arc 140T Mobile vs HD Graphics 400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1089not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.91no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Arrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed320 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200150.4
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1264
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Arc 140T Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 420 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.