UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs HD Graphics 3000

Place in the ranking	1190	743
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Generation 6.0 (2011)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code name	Sandy Bridge GT2+	Rocket Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2011 (13 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	32
Core clock speed	650 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	1,160 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	no data
Texture fill rate	15.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.2496 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	2	no data
TMUs	12	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12_1
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.1	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 3.30
+400%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 3000 1568

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 5134
+227%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 3000 2503

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 11315
+352%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9 −111%	19 +111%
1440p	3−4 −400%	15 +400%
4K	2−3 −400%	10 +400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −150%	15 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Dota 2	3 −300%	12 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −100%	16 +100%
Fortnite	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
World of Tanks	11 −427%	55−60 +427%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Dota 2	7 −357%	32 +357%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −117%	13 +117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
World of Tanks	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Valorant	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	3−4
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +25%	12 −25%
Valorant	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Elden Ring	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Elden Ring	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 111% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 400% faster in 1440p
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics 3000 is 25% faster.
in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD Graphics 3000 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 33 tests (57%)
there's a draw in 24 tests (41%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.66	3.30
Recency	1 February 2011	30 March 2021
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.