GeForce RTX 3080 vs HD Graphics 3000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with GeForce RTX 3080, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

RTX 3080 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 9811% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118526
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.25
Power efficiencyno data14.25
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores968704
Core clock speed650 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown320 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60465.1
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS29.77 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs12272
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data760.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
RTX 3080 65.41
+9811%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 3000 254
RTX 3080 25233
+9834%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 3000 1568
RTX 3080 91747
+5751%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 3000 2503
RTX 3080 188064
+7415%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−1778%
169
+1778%
1440p1−2
−12600%
127
+12600%
4K0−186

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.14
1440pno data5.50
4Kno data8.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3275%
130−140
+3275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4500%
138
+4500%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15800%
150−160
+15800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2220%
116
+2220%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2100%
240−250
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4417%
270−280
+4417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−727%
248
+727%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3275%
130−140
+3275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4367%
134
+4367%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15800%
150−160
+15800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2260%
118
+2260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2100%
240−250
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5333%
326
+5333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1290%
130−140
+1290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−693%
238
+693%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3275%
130−140
+3275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4267%
131
+4267%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1555%
182
+1555%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4683%
287
+4683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1390%
149
+1390%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−237%
101
+237%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−10200%
100−110
+10200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8500%
86
+8500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7600%
75−80
+7600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
112
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−4933%
151
+4933%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−12250%
247
+12250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4233%
130
+4233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 52

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95
+4650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 111
+0%
111
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 131
+0%
131
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 96
+0%
96
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 131
+0%
131
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 219
+0%
219
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 57
+0%
57
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 142
+0%
142
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+0%
115
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135
+0%
135
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+0%
54
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and RTX 3080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is 1778% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 12600% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3080 is 15800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 65.41
Recency 1 February 2011 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm

RTX 3080 has a 9810.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2399 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5949 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.