GeForce 256 DDR vs HD Graphics 3000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1187not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+NV10 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)23 December 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed650 MHz120 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,160 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm220 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate15.600.48
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)7.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.11.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 23 December 1999
Chip lithography 32 nm 220 nm

HD Graphics 3000 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and GeForce 256 DDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while GeForce 256 DDR is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA GeForce 256 DDR
GeForce 256 DDR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2438 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 208 votes

Rate GeForce 256 DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.