UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 3000 HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5300 HD Graphics 5500 HD Graphics 5600 HD Graphics 6000
VS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.48

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1231866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.48
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4824
Core clock speed850 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate8.100no data
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1no data
TMUs6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−18.2%
13
+18.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Valorant 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−153%
40−45
+153%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 10−12
−54.5%
17
+54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Metro Exodus 0−1 4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−100%
8
+100%
Valorant 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 10−12
−45.5%
16
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 18% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is ahead in 28 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.48 1.96
Recency 1 February 2011 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 308.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
vs
GT 330M GeForce GT 330M
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
vs
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
ATI FireGL 9600 T2-128 FireGL 9600 T2-128
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
Marvel G200
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
GT 710 PCIe x1 GT 710 PCIe x1
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
GeForce MX550 MX550
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
RTX 4070 RTX 4070
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 1372 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2000 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.