Radeon Instinct MI300X vs H800 SXM5

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureHopper (2022−2023)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameGH100Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1689619456
Core clock speed1095 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors80,000 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)700 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate926.62,554
Floating-point processing power59.3 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs24no data
TMUs5281216
Tensor Cores5281216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
WidthSXM ModuleOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount80 GB192 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,681 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
Shader ModelN/AN/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA9.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 80 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 700 Watt 750 Watt

H800 SXM5 has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between H800 SXM5 and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA H800 SXM5
H800 SXM5
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate H800 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 57 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.