RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs H100 SXM5

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.70
ArchitectureHopper (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGH100no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84483072
Core clock speed1065 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1780 MHzno data
Number of transistors80,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)700 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate939.8no data
Floating-point processing power30.07 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs528no data
Tensor Cores528no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount80 GB8 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,920 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate
Shader ModelN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCL3.0no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA9.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 80 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 700 Watt 115 Watt

H100 SXM5 has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 508.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between H100 SXM5 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that H100 SXM5 is a workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA H100 SXM5
H100 SXM5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 27 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 18 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.