Radeon Graphics vs ATI Graphics Ultra XLR VLB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated897
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiencyno data9.21
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMach32Renoir
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1993 (31 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed10 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology700 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBIGP
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 MB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 700 nm 7 nm

Graphics has a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra XLR VLB and Radeon Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra XLR VLB
Graphics Ultra XLR VLB
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra XLR VLB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6245 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.