Arctic Sound-M vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameMach32Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 January 1993 (31 year ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8192
Core clock speed10 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rateno data230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 10 nm

Arctic Sound-M has a 1638300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.