Ironlake vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)	Generation 5.75
GPU code name	Crestline	Ironlake
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	no data
Current price	$77	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	96
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	177 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13.5 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

-

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	10.1
Shader Model	no data	4.1
OpenGL	no data	2.1
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	no data	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

90 nm

45 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---