Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code name	Crestline	Pineview
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	2
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	200 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	123 Million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13.5 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

-

+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

10

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	9 May 2007	10 January 2010
Chip lithography	90 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---