Xbox One S GPU vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 5 Arrandale (2010)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGMA HDDurango 2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2010 (14 years ago)2 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12768
Core clock speed500 MHz914 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.87
Floating-point processing powerno data1.404 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1066 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.22 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 2 August 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics has 171.4% lower power consumption.

Xbox One S GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Xbox One S GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
AMD Xbox One S GPU
Xbox One S GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 137 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 174 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.