GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 75 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 94 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 40.55 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.97 |
| Architecture | Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GMA HD | TU104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 January 2010 (15 years ago) | 9 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 12 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 283.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 9.062 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 160 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 320 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 40 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2010 | 9 July 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 215 Watt |
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics has 514.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 2070 Super, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and GeForce RTX 2070 Super. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
