GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated25
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data40.87
Power efficiencyno data13.76
ArchitectureGen. 3 (2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGMA 950GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2005 (19 years ago)11 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48960
Core clock speedno data1260 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rateno data478.8
Floating-point processing powerno data30.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data912.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2005 11 January 2022
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 350 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 has 4900% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 12 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 and GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 76 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 936 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.