UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	not rated	721
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)	no data
GPU code name	Cedar Trail	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 November 2011 (13 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4	32
Core clock speed	no data	1250 MHz
Boost clock speed	640 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

no data

12_1

Pros & cons summary

---

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---